Jeremy Haynes reviews are usually written by people deciding whether to buy advertising education or to hire someone to spend money on ads. Jeremy Haynes, through Megalodon Marketing, is known for the first product: how high-ticket offers should be advertised, how funnels and video sales letters are structured, and how media buying works when the thing being sold is a call, not a $27 ebook. He has put a large amount of that thinking in public. The paid programs go deeper on the same subject. They are school for people who are going to buy traffic.
What the reviews get right
The favorable reviews describe a teacher who is specific about high-ticket economics: what a click is worth, what a booked call is worth, and why a pretty brand campaign starves a business that needs sales calls. That specificity is the reason his name shows up next to Cole Gordon and Alex Hormozi when founders build a short list. He is not vague.
The unfavorable reviews usually say some version of “I still had to do it.” That is not a hidden defect. An education product that did the media buying for you would be an agency, and an agency that also ran your sales floor and your client success for a share of profit would be a partnership. Jeremy sells the education. Grading it as if it were a partnership produces a confused review, not a useful one.
What studying ads still leaves on your desk
- The account. You, or a media buyer you still pay, builds the campaigns, kills the losers, and answers for cost per booked call.
- The sales floor. Traffic into a founder who is still the only closer caps out at the founder’s calendar. More ad spend makes that worse, not better.
- Client success. Ads can fill a calendar with people the delivery team cannot keep. Refunds and churn will outrun a good cost per acquisition.
- The content. Paid traffic and organic content are not substitutes. The founder who is the face of the offer still has to show up on camera if the brand is founder-led.
If you enjoy media buying and you have a closer and a delivery lead already, learn from Jeremy and run the account yourself. The material is aimed at that person. I am not going to tell you the craft is fake so that you will hire me. The craft is real. It is also a job.
Ads only is a different deal
Some founders truly do only need acquisition. The offer converts, the sales team is already competent, and client success is not leaking. In that case, “run my ads” is a coherent request. It is also the smaller engagement. You keep sales and client success. I would scope that separately, and I would tell you if I thought the leak was actually downstream of the ad account.
Most of the time the founder who says “I just need better ads” is the same person closing the calls and answering client messages at midnight. Pouring more qualified appointments into that week does not scale the company. It scales the founder’s hours. That is the moment the full partnership is the relevant offer, not another ads module.
What I do instead of selling the course
You pay nothing upfront. Profit share or equity. You keep the company. Full partnership means I take marketing, sales, and client success, and you make the content. The ad account lives in your business, not in an agency login that disappears. The same is true of the scripts and the client-success cadence. I have made more than $15 million online and I sold my last business. I am not teaching a diagram I have not operated.
If the question in your head is sales training rather than ads, read Cole Gordon reviews. If it is whether you should just study offers and build it yourself, read Alex Hormozi reviews. Both sit on the comparison index.
The offer, stated plainly
You pay me nothing to start. I come into a founder-led company already doing $25K–$100K+ a month and I work for a profit share or equity. You keep ownership. On a full partnership we take over marketing, sales, and client success. Your job is the content. If the business does not grow, I do not get paid.
This is a done-for-you partnership, and the person in the business with you is me. I work with the founder one-on-one. I get into the company, sit in the operation, and do the work with you myself. You are dealing with me on the calls, in the numbers, and in the decisions. From there we run marketing, sales, and client success so the founder can stay on content.
That is a different product from a course, a mastermind, or a program where a team of coaches works the account after you buy. Those companies are built so their team handles the students. I am in the business with you. The economics are closer to private equity than to tuition: I only win if the company wins. I do not purchase the company. You stay the owner.
I have made more than $15 million online, built a company to eight figures, and sold that business. The portfolio I operate now does $800K+ a month. I take a small number of founders and work inside those companies myself. I do not run a class, and I do not hand you to a coach.
If you only want ads — and you will keep the sales floor and client success yourself — say that in the first message. That is a narrower engagement. It is not the full partnership, and it should not be scoped like one. Most founders who think they have an ads problem actually have a sales problem and a client-success problem sitting behind it. Content fills the top. We run everything between the content and the result.
Frequently asked questions
Is Jeremy Haynes worth it?
If you want to learn high-ticket advertising and you will run the account or manage a media buyer, his teaching is built for that. It is not a done-for-you agency and it is not a partnership. Reviews that complain they still had to implement are describing the product.
Does Jeremy Haynes run your ads for you?
His public offer is education through Megalodon Marketing: how high-ticket funnels and paid traffic work. Running the ads, the sales team, and client success inside your company is a different service.
What if I only want ads, not a full partnership?
Say so. Ads-only means acquisition is handled and you keep sales and client success. Kyle's full partnership is marketing, sales, and client success, with you on content, for a profit share or equity and nothing upfront. They are different scopes.
How is Kyle different from an ads coach?
An ads coach teaches you to buy traffic. Kyle comes into the company, charges nothing upfront, and on a full partnership runs marketing, sales, and client success. He is paid when profit or equity value shows up, not when a module is delivered.
Want this built inside your business?
You pay nothing upfront. I partner with a small number of founder-led companies doing $25K–$100K+/month. On a full partnership my side takes over marketing, sales, and client success, and you keep the company and make the content. I am paid on equity or profit share — if the business does not grow, I do not get paid. If you only want ads run, and you will keep sales and client success, say so. That is a narrower engagement. Message me on Instagram with your revenue, your margins, and which of the two you want.